7 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by zedster66 on May 14, 2013 at 4:22 pm

    I saw something yesterday that says this isn’t really true, the size was taken from the housing act to do with overcrowding. The worry about this is dining rooms being classed as extra bedrooms.


  2. Posted by The Femmetastic Feminist on April 6, 2013 at 11:54 am

    A bedroom tax???? confused Aussie scratches her head…


    • The government are claiming extra money from each house that has an unused bedroom, if their residents are receiving any benefits!
      So, all children under 10 must share a room. Over 10 up to 4children of the same sex must share a room, or money wil need to be paid back to the government.
      Not a people’s government then.


      • Posted by The Femmetastic Feminist on April 7, 2013 at 12:14 am

        ffs. I often wonder how the government can justify funding the royal family yet doing this to the people. I also wonder how the people stand for it, why is there not more opposition?
        thanks for explaining the tax, it is godsmackingly unfair.


I welcome any and all comment, words are the beginning of conversation.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: